Re: data received but not detected

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Evgeniy Polyakov
Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 - 11:28 pm

Hi.

On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 05:58:26PM -0500, Travis Stratman (tstratman@emacinc.com) wrote:

Did you run wireshark on receiver or sender?
Check MIB stats if packet was dropped because of low mem or incorrect
checksumm or some other problematic fields in UDP header. Sending part
can see it perfectly correct, which will not be the issue on the
receiver. If packet was delivered to receiving host, udp input path is
rather simple so there are no places which can race with something and
thus lost the packet.

-- 
	Evgeniy Polyakov
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
data received but not detected, Travis Stratman, (Tue Jun 17, 3:08 pm)
Re: data received but not detected, Stephen Hemminger, (Tue Jun 17, 3:27 pm)
Re: data received but not detected, Ben Greear, (Tue Jun 17, 3:31 pm)
Re: data received but not detected, Travis Stratman, (Tue Jun 17, 3:40 pm)
Re: data received but not detected, Travis Stratman, (Tue Jun 17, 3:58 pm)
Re: data received but not detected, Ben Greear, (Tue Jun 17, 4:45 pm)
Re: data received but not detected, Evgeniy Polyakov, (Tue Jun 17, 11:28 pm)
Re: data received but not detected, Travis Stratman, (Thu Jun 19, 3:53 pm)
Re: data received but not detected, Ben Greear, (Thu Jun 19, 4:08 pm)
Re: data received but not detected, Travis Stratman, (Thu Jun 19, 4:10 pm)
Re: data received but not detected, James Chapman, (Sun Jun 22, 2:16 am)
Re: data received but not detected, Travis Stratman, (Mon Jul 7, 2:56 pm)
Re: data received but not detected, James Chapman, (Tue Jul 8, 2:37 am)
Re: data received but not detected, Travis Stratman, (Tue Jul 15, 1:46 pm)