Re: packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Denys Fedoryshchenko
Date: Monday, June 16, 2008 - 1:20 pm

On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 21:48:55 +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote
routes):
MegaRouter-KARAM ~ # ethtool -g eth1
Ring parameters for eth1:
Pre-set maximums:
RX:             4096
RX Mini:        0
RX Jumbo:       0
TX:             4096
Current hardware settings:
RX:             256
RX Mini:        0
RX Jumbo:       0
TX:             256

After i tried to set ethtool -G eth1 4096 system becomes extremely slow, what
is very strange for me. I had to soft-reboot it (over kexec).

MegaRouter-KARAM ~ # cat /proc/interrupts;sleep 10;cat /proc/interrupts
           CPU0       CPU1
  0:      86148          0   IO-APIC-edge      timer
  1:          2          0   IO-APIC-edge      i8042
  9:          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   acpi
 12:          5          0   IO-APIC-edge      i8042
 16:          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   uhci_hcd:usb3
 18:          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   ehci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb7
 19:          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   uhci_hcd:usb6
 21:          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   uhci_hcd:usb4
 23:        968          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   ehci_hcd:usb2, uhci_hcd:usb5
217:          3    1460438   PCI-MSI-edge      eth1
NMI:      86087      85892   Non-maskable interrupts
LOC:          0      85892   Local timer interrupts
RES:         44         81   Rescheduling interrupts
CAL:         88         56   function call interrupts
TLB:         91         78   TLB shootdowns
TRM:          0          0   Thermal event interrupts
SPU:          0          0   Spurious interrupts
ERR:          0
MIS:          0
           CPU0       CPU1
  0:      96150          0   IO-APIC-edge      timer
  1:          2          0   IO-APIC-edge      i8042
  9:          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   acpi
 12:          5          0   IO-APIC-edge      i8042
 16:          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   uhci_hcd:usb3
 18:          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   ehci_hcd:usb1, uhci_hcd:usb7
 19:          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   uhci_hcd:usb6
 21:          0          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   uhci_hcd:usb4
 23:        968          0   IO-APIC-fasteoi   ehci_hcd:usb2, uhci_hcd:usb5
217:          3    1646537   PCI-MSI-edge      eth1
NMI:      96088      95893   Non-maskable interrupts
LOC:          0      95893   Local timer interrupts
RES:         44         81   Rescheduling interrupts
CAL:         89         56   function call interrupts
TLB:         91         78   TLB shootdowns
TRM:          0          0   Thermal event interrupts
SPU:          0          0   Spurious interrupts
ERR:          0
MIS:          0


About NMI interrupts - nmi_watchdog=1, if i disable it, it doesn't change
anything.



--
Denys Fedoryshchenko
Technical Manager
Virtual ISP S.A.L.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169?, Denys Fedoryshchenko, (Mon Jun 16, 12:37 pm)
Re: packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169?, Eric Dumazet, (Mon Jun 16, 12:48 pm)
Re: packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169?, Auke Kok, (Mon Jun 16, 1:15 pm)
Re: packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169?, Denys Fedoryshchenko, (Mon Jun 16, 1:20 pm)
Re: packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169?, Denys Fedoryshchenko, (Mon Jun 16, 1:23 pm)
Re: packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169?, Francois Romieu, (Mon Jun 16, 1:26 pm)
Re: packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169?, Denys Fedoryshchenko, (Mon Jun 16, 1:29 pm)
Re: packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169?, Kok, Auke, (Mon Jun 16, 1:36 pm)
RE: packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169?, Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P, (Mon Jun 16, 1:37 pm)
RE: packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169?, Denys Fedoryshchenko, (Mon Jun 16, 1:42 pm)
Re: packetloss, on e1000e worse than r8169?, Denys Fedoryshchenko, (Mon Jun 16, 1:52 pm)