Re: [RFC v2] mac80211: assign needed_headroom/tailroom for netdevs

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: David Miller <davem@...>
Cc: <tomasw@...>, <linville@...>, <netdev@...>, <linux-wireless@...>
Date: Monday, May 5, 2008 - 4:10 pm

> And the copy is necessary because you need more tailroom or something?

I think it's probably all because I don't understand skb_cloned() vs.
skb_header_cloned() and mac80211 came with checks for skb_cloned() that
I didn't spot.

So you're saying the check there to see if we can add 802.11 headers
should depend on skb_header_cloned() and not skb_cloned()?


When is protocol header equivalent to skb header and when not?

johannes
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC v2] mac80211: assign needed_headroom/tailroom for n..., Johannes Berg, (Mon May 5, 4:10 pm)