On Mon, 2008-05-05 at 12:43 +0300, Ilpo J=C3=A4rvinen wrote:
quoted text
> On Mon, 5 May 2008, David Miller wrote:
>=20
> > From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> > Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 09:31:15 +0200
> >=20
> > > If we decide to uninline those functions for another reason (used too
> > > much, code size, ...) then we can still do that.
> >=20
> > Agreed.
>=20
> According to my measurements the size bloat of those two is
> (x86/32bit, gcc 4.1.2 redhat something):
>=20
> -1091  40 funcs, 89 +, 1180 -, diff: -1091 --- skb_set_owner_r
> -495  46 funcs, 70 +, 565 -, diff: -495 --- skb_set_owner_w

So do we want to out-line them? I don't really know the scale involved.
If so I can resubmit this patch with them outlined and the warnings
added (but did you account for the EXPORT_SYMBOL space?)

johannes