Daniel Walker wrote:
quoted text
> From a reviews perspective what I would want is each set of changes,
> file system, networking, arch, etc split into separate patches. For
> example you have a number of patches just adding header files. You could
> merge the header file with the hook additions. Then you have a natural
> code split up which should be easier to review..
Filesystem part to fsdevel, socket operation part to netdev. That's OK.
But I wonder where to post the rest part.
Since the patches for passing "struct vfsmount" to LSM has been rejected,
TOMOYO has been unable to use LSM.
Thus, I proposed this patch set as a non-LSM version, but it bothers me
where to post this patch. If you know, please teach me where to post.

quoted text
> > --- linux-2.6.25-rc8-mm1.orig/include/linux/init_task.h
> > +++ linux-2.6.25-rc8-mm1/include/linux/init_task.h
> > @@ -197,6 +197,10 @@ extern struct group_info init_groups;
> >  	INIT_IDS							\
> >  	INIT_TRACE_IRQFLAGS						\
> >  	INIT_LOCKDEP							\
> > +	/***** TOMOYO Linux start. *****/        \
> > +	.domain_info = &KERNEL_DOMAIN,           \
> > +	.tomoyo_flags = 0,                       \
> > +	/***** TOMOYO Linux end. *****/          \
> >  }
> 
> ifdef's ?

Or security_initcall()?

quoted text
> > @@ -1278,6 +1283,10 @@ struct task_struct {
> >  	int latency_record_count;
> >  	struct latency_record latency_record[LT_SAVECOUNT];
> >  #endif
> > +	/***** TOMOYO Linux start. *****/
> > +	struct domain_info *domain_info;
> > +	u32 tomoyo_flags;
> > +	/***** TOMOYO Linux end. *****/
> >  };
> 
> ifdefs? 
>
I see.

Thank you.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html