David Miller wrote:I understand your concern. It is pretty easy break routing cache with some seemingly unrelated changes. I tried to think about possible side effects, but concluded that this should be safe. Then again, I don't know all the tiny details and unusual scenarios. But I have been running a 2.6.23 kernel with (backported) patch on a production machine (router connected to two ISPs, internal subnet and also having multiple gre tunnels), so far I have not encountered any problems. Cheers, Timo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Nigel Cunningham | Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway |
| Paul Mundt | Re: 2.6.22-rc4-mm2 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
git: | |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
