Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
 net/mac80211/mesh.h      |    1 +
 net/mac80211/mesh_hwmp.c |    1 -
 2 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mac80211/mesh.h b/net/mac80211/mesh.h
index 742003d..9ee3aff 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/mesh.h
+++ b/net/mac80211/mesh.h
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
 
 #include <linux/types.h>
 #include <linux/jhash.h>
+#include <asm/unaligned.h>
 #include "ieee80211_i.h"
 
 
diff --git a/net/mac80211/mesh_hwmp.c b/net/mac80211/mesh_hwmp.c
index 02de8f1..3df8092 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/mesh_hwmp.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/mesh_hwmp.c
@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@
  * published by the Free Software Foundation.
  */
 
-#include <asm/unaligned.h>
 #include "mesh.h"
 
 #define TEST_FRAME_LEN	8192
-- 
1.5.3.GIT

--

It has been discussed that any .h file should pull
in what it needs so the other of includes does not matter.
Some do them alphabetically.

Why not fix asm-*/unaligned.h so all users now and future
are fixed in one shot?

	Sam
--

It has been discussed or it has been agreed?  IMO it's a bullshit - especially
for low-level stuff like that.

As for the way some do includes...  It's not exactly a family-friendly list,
but still I'd rather not comment in details on the existing practices...
--

I'm redoing the unaligned handling in -mm at the moment, and it avoids
this problem.

Harvey

--

From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

Patch applied, thanks a lot Al.
--