Le Thursday 24 April 2008 15:19:53 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明, vous avez écrit :
quoted text
> RFC3542 discusses about IPPROTO_IPV6 level IPV6_CHECKSUM socket option
> only. IPPROTO_RAW level IPV6_CHECKSUM socket option is undocumented Linux
> extension.  So, we are free to choose allowing setting that option on
> ICMPv6 socket as we have been doing.

I wonder why RFC3542 forbids the contentious case. Is it a security 
consideration, that userland should not be allowed to create bogus ICMPv6 
packets (IPV6_CHECKSUM can be set after dropping root after opening a raw 
socket, right?), or is it just some random IETF folklore ??

I'd note that my ndisc6 package does call setsockopt(SOL_IPV6, 
ICMPV6_CHECKSUM). Fortunately, it does not check for error values, so I don't 
really care if this is changed.

-- 
Rémi Denis-Courmont
http://www.remlab.net/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html