login
Header Space

 
 

Re: XTP for 2.6.25

Score:
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <netdev@...>
Date: Thursday, April 24, 2008 - 9:06 am

Now I have connected 2 hosts directly, and evaluate the each throughput.
Then all the results of UDP, TCP and XTP are the same and 94Mbps. (My
netwrok is 100Base/TX).

In this case round-trip time between 2 hosts is less than 0.1ms
because they are directly connected. But my previouse case, round-trip
time between 2 hosts are 4ms. (I use IPSEC between the security
gateways to increase delay).
I think that's the reason TCP throughput is slow. If ACK packets are
delayed, sending window cannot slide and sending packets cannot be
fully bursted.

If I changes wmem size through /proc/sys/net/ipv4/tcp_wmem, TCP's
throughput may improve, but congestion control becomes more difficult
for TCP.

That is TCP's disadvantage to XTP.

Best
Shigeo

On 4/24/08, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: XTP for 2.6.25, Andi Kleen, (Thu Apr 24, 7:27 am)
Re: XTP for 2.6.25, Shigeo N, (Thu Apr 24, 9:06 am)
Re: XTP for 2.6.25, Shigeo N, (Fri Apr 25, 3:59 am)
Re: XTP for 2.6.25, Ilpo Järvinen, (Fri Apr 25, 4:23 am)
Re: XTP for 2.6.25, Shigeo N, (Wed May 7, 12:32 am)
Re: XTP for 2.6.25, Shigeo N, (Fri Apr 25, 4:51 am)
Re: XTP for 2.6.25, David Miller, (Fri Apr 25, 4:55 am)
Re: XTP for 2.6.25, Ilpo Järvinen, (Fri Apr 25, 9:05 am)
Re: XTP for 2.6.25, David Miller, (Fri Apr 25, 4:12 pm)
Re: XTP for 2.6.25, Ilpo Järvinen, (Fri Apr 25, 5:06 pm)
Re: XTP for 2.6.25, David Miller, (Fri Apr 25, 4:28 am)
speck-geostationary