Stephen Hemminger wrote:
quoted text
> On Mon, 14 Apr 2008 11:01:16 -0700
> Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> 
>> The r8169.c driver is calling netif_receive_skb from hardirq and with interrupts off,
>> which seems to be invalid (the comments of netif_receive_skb) certainly say so.
>>
>> The calltrace is like this:
>>
>> packet_rcv
>> netif_receive_skb
>> rtl8168_rx_interrupt
>> rtl8168_interrupt
>> handle_IRQ_event
>> handle_fasteoi_irq
>> do_IRQ
>>
>>
>> Which triggers a warning in packet_rcv() since that does a local_bh_enable(),
>> which gives a WARN_ON if irqs are disabled (rightfully so it seems).
>>
>> The code looks is in rtl8169_rx_interrupt() line 2832 and looks like
>>
>>                          if (rtl8169_rx_vlan_skb(tp, desc, skb) < 0)
>>                                  rtl8169_rx_skb(skb);
>>
>> with
>> #define rtl8169_rx_skb                  netif_receive_skb
>> higher up in the file.
>>
>> This is the 46th highest ranking warnon/oops report for 2.6.25-rc
>>
> 
> rtl8169_rx_skb is defined as netif_receive_skb only if NAPI is enabled.
> But the backtrace has CONFIG_R8169_NAPI disabled.

what makes you think this config option is disabled ?
(just curious)

quoted text
> I also concerned that the reset_task calls rx_interrupt with different locking
> than normal interrupt. 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html