On Mon, 2008-04-14 at 13:19 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:We do it for all new rules, regardless of pre-existing rules with that name. It just does not add KERNEL, if some external tool tried to overwrite the kernel name, we write a rule for. Not sure why Fedora rules are mangling INTERFACE_NAME here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440568#c4 Right, we will do that, if there are no other issues coming up with the general approach of adding KERNEL matches. Right, I'm just waiting for Marco to comment on this. Sure, that's why we have it in every default rule. It can just be in all rules, like the ATTR{type} match, right? Thanks, Kay -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Gabriel C | Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS] |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Thomas Jarosch | Re: TCP connection stalls under 2.6.24.7 |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
