Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:Well less shit would happen if developers would take the time to at least test their patches before they were submitted. It like we will just have the poor user do our testing for us. What kind of testing do developers do. I been a linux user and have followed the LKML for a number of years and have yet to see any test plans for any submitted patches. My $.02 Steve Clark -- "They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin) "The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases." (Thomas Jefferson) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Alan Cox | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 007/196] Chinese: add translation of stable_kernel_rules.txt |
| Eric W. Biederman | Re: [net-2.6.24][patch 2/2] Dynamically allocate the loopback device |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 15/37] dccp: Set per-connection CCIDs via socket options |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
