Evgeniy Polyakov wrote:Well less shit would happen if developers would take the time to at least test their patches before they were submitted. It like we will just have the poor user do our testing for us. What kind of testing do developers do. I been a linux user and have followed the LKML for a number of years and have yet to see any test plans for any submitted patches. My $.02 Steve Clark -- "They that give up essential liberty to obtain temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." (Ben Franklin) "The course of history shows that as a government grows, liberty decreases." (Thomas Jefferson) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Heiko Carstens | [patch -mm] s390: struct bin_attribute changes |
| Andrew Morton | 2.6.25-rc2-mm1 |
| Eric W. Biederman | Re: [PATCH] kexec: force x86_64 arches to boot kdump kernels on boot cpu |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jens Axboe | Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [PATCH] PHYLIB: IRQ event workqueue handling fixes |
