David Miller schrieb:ot I think you got it backwards. Mark and other bug reporters (including, at times, yours truly) are helping you and other developers to make Linux better. Most of the times I report a bug, I am not asking for help - I have no personal need to get it fixed, as I can easily avoid it, and I only report it to give developers like you a chance to fix it before it really hurts someone - and I gather that Mark has been in a similar position wrt to the bug in question. So what would you have us do? Not report the bugs we find so that you don't have to invest your spare time on "our" bugs? Report them and accept a rebuke for our "unwillingness" to do even more benevolent work than we already did? Report only those for which we really need a fix, and are consequently willing to invest additional time? Thanks, Tilman
| Adrian Bunk | Re: Linux 2.6.21 |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.21-rc2 |
| WANG Cong | [-mm Patch] UML: fix a building error |
| Roland McGrath | Re: [PATCH 0/5] ftrace: to kill a daemon |
git: | |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Patrick McHardy | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu spinlock rather than RCU (v3) |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Theodore Ts'o | Re: cc1 fails silently |
| Michael Nolan | Power routines on notebook cause kernel panic |
| Marc Peters | v 0.11 boot disk problem |
| Dave `geek' Gymer | WARNING (was Re: New afio release) |
