Jeff Garzik wrote:
quoted text
> Auke Kok wrote:
>> From: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
>>
>> The ndev_* printk's are too lenghty and we don't need to specify
>> the adapter/netdev struct at all, making this a lot more readable.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com>
>> ---
>>
>>  drivers/net/e1000e/e1000.h   |   27 ++++----
>>  drivers/net/e1000e/ethtool.c |   38 +++++------
>>  drivers/net/e1000e/netdev.c  |  148 +++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>>  drivers/net/e1000e/param.c   |   31 +++------
>>  4 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 136 deletions(-)
> 
> This stuff should just be removed.
> 
> Either the code should be outputting "ethX: blahblah" via printk(), or 
> the code should be outputting the standard dev_printk() prefix [driver 
> name, PCI device info].
> 
> Also, it is recommended to use the NETIF_MSG_xxx bits to permit 
> fine-grained control over which messages are output, on a per-port basis 
> (controlled via ethtool).  grep around for 'msg_enable'

yes and I even tried pushing for a generic netdev printk that incorporates the
msg_enable bits properly

I also got absolutely unwelcome responses to that, if not none :)

once we get such a thing, we can incorporate this into e1000 with this patch by
changing 2 lines. so I think this patch is still a good thing, and it certainly
removes a lot of wrapped lines.

Auke

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html