On Mon, Mar 03, 2008 at 11:08:44AM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
quoted text
> On Mon, 3 Mar 2008, Nick Piggin wrote:
> 
> > SLUB should pack even small objects nicely into cachelines if that is what
> > has been asked for. Use the same algorithm as SLAB for this.
> 
> Why? SLAB does not cacheline align objects smaller than cache_line_size() 
> /2.

It still doesn't after this patch.

quoted text
> If they are already not cache line aligned then we can make them as 
> dense as possible. That is what SLUB does.

Because when you specify HWCACHE_ALIGN, it means that you want the object
not to cross cacheline boundaries for at least cache_line_size() bytes.
SLAB does this. SLUB does not without this patch.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html