Home » Mailing list archives » linux-netdev » 2008 » March » 21

Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@...>
To: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, David Brownell <david-b@...>, Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...>, <netdev@...>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...>, <linux-usb@...>, <linux-wireless@...>, <video4linux-list@...>, <lm-sensors@...>
Subject: Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c
Date: Friday, March 21, 2008 - 8:37 am

On Fri, 21 Mar 2008, Stefan Richter wrote:

Which, I think, is exactly the config where in_atomic() can't be used to
mean "in_scheduleable_context()" ?

-- 
  "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring
  them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond
  where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot
  Henrique Holschuh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Andrew Morton, (Thu Mar 20, 9:08 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, David Brownell, (Fri Mar 21, 1:04 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Stefan Richter, (Fri Mar 21, 5:21 am)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh..., (Fri Mar 21, 8:37 am)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Stefan Richter, (Fri Mar 21, 9:16 am)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Stefan Richter, (Sat Mar 22, 7:29 am)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Stefan Richter, (Fri Mar 21, 5:27 am)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Alan Stern, (Thu Mar 20, 9:31 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Michael Buesch, (Thu Mar 20, 9:36 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Andrew Morton, (Thu Mar 20, 10:27 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Heiko Carstens, (Fri Mar 21, 9:47 am)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Greg KH, (Fri Mar 21, 12:54 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Andrew Morton, (Fri Mar 21, 3:59 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Michael Buesch, (Fri Mar 21, 4:16 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Michael Buesch, (Fri Mar 21, 4:20 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Alan Stern, (Thu Mar 20, 11:07 pm)
Re: use of preempt_count instead of in_atomic() at leds-gpio.c, Andrew Morton, (Thu Mar 20, 11:17 pm)