From: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net> Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2008 19:39:33 +0100I think you're semantically testing the wrong thing. It's not if unaligned accesses are supported, it's if they are efficient enough or not. For example, sparc64 fully handles unaligned accesses but taking the trap to fix it up is slow. So sparc64 "can" handle unaligned accesses, but whether we want to set this symbol or not is another matter. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Geert Uytterhoeven | Re: linux-next: Tree for August 14 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Woodhouse | Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
