On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 03:07:05PM +0100, Djalel Chefrour wrote: ...I don't know this patch, but if it's about some fine graining, maybe it's better to get it working with a vanilla version first. Anyway, you wondered why 1:110 could be treated unfair vs. 1:20, so I wonder, why it has worse parameters than 1:20 (also by default?). I'm not sure where you set this mtu, or if it's changed by this atm patch, but HTB gets packets bigger than it can rate, so you probably should set HTB's mtu parameter higher, until these giants are not reported. I'm not sure if HTB uses these overlimits for classes yet. But, I don't see why should you care about this so much: it only tells generally how much classes delay sending - not about overloading. If I don't miss something in your problem, you should check first if 1:110 class works OK without any traffic in 1:20, and if so, than limit 1:20 parameters until it doesn't affect 1:110 anymore. Jarek P. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Washington Odhiambo | Weird Problem with NAT - more details |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Denys Fedoryshchenko | thousands of classes, e1000 TX unit hang |
