Re: Does HTB traffic shaping happen on leaf classes only or could it happen at root qdisc

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Djalel Chefrour <cdjalel@...>
Cc: <netdev@...>
Date: Thursday, March 20, 2008 - 3:49 pm

On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 03:07:05PM +0100, Djalel Chefrour wrote:
...

I don't know this patch, but if it's about some fine graining, maybe
it's better to get it working with a vanilla version first. Anyway,
you wondered why 1:110 could be treated unfair vs. 1:20, so I wonder,
why it has worse parameters than 1:20 (also by default?).


I'm not sure where you set this mtu, or if it's changed by this atm
patch, but HTB gets packets bigger than it can rate, so you probably
should set HTB's mtu parameter higher, until these giants are not
reported.


I'm not sure if HTB uses these overlimits for classes yet. But, I
don't see why should you care about this so much: it only tells
generally how much classes delay sending - not about overloading.

If I don't miss something in your problem, you should check first
if 1:110 class works OK without any traffic in 1:20, and if so, than
limit 1:20 parameters until it doesn't affect 1:110 anymore.

Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Does HTB traffic shaping happen on leaf classes only or ..., Jarek Poplawski, (Thu Mar 20, 3:49 pm)