On Thu, 2008-02-21 at 02:05 -0800, David Miller wrote:Indeed, either of those will work. Yeah, I saw that discussion. I think it's fine, it's just something we need to be aware of. In fact, I Joe had a patch (that seems to have gotten lost?) to make DECLARE_MAC_BUF() declare a structure with the u8 pointer in it instead to get type checking for the args, which would make our code there not even compile, and imho rightfully so. I'll send in a patch to fix this (via John) and Joe can resend his patch to get typechecking there. johannes
| David Miller | Re: Slow DOWN, please!!! |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Greg KH | Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Josip Rodin | bnx2_poll panicking kernel |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
