RE: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Brandeburg, Jesse
Date: Monday, December 8, 2008 - 1:42 pm

Jesper Krogh wrote:

you can test 2.6.27-rcX without worry for e1000e device corruption IF
you set CONFIG_FTRACE=n

ftrace was the code that ran over the registers mapped by e1000e.

just FYI, I know this thread is ancient.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6, Jesper Krogh, (Sun Nov 16, 2:41 am)
Re: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6, Jay Vosburgh, (Mon Nov 17, 4:45 pm)
Re: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6, Jesper Krogh, (Tue Nov 18, 1:24 pm)
Re: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6, Jesper Krogh, (Tue Nov 18, 1:28 pm)
Re: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6, Jay Vosburgh, (Tue Nov 18, 1:53 pm)
Re: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6, Jesper Krogh, (Wed Nov 19, 12:53 am)
Re: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6, Jesper Krogh, (Wed Nov 19, 3:01 am)
RE: Regression in bonding between 2.6.26.8 and 2.6.27.6, Brandeburg, Jesse, (Mon Dec 8, 1:42 pm)