Re: Is it valid to add a macvlan virtual interface to a bridge? If so, there seems to be a bug with it.

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Patrick McHardy
Date: Thursday, December 4, 2008 - 6:01 am

Mark Smith wrote:

Actually there's no limit of 99. The only limiting factor is
the hash size off 256.


Yes, that seems correct.


Unfortunately one of both combinations will not work, no matter
what we do. The bridge code could issue a warning when adding
a bridge on top of a macvlan device, but there's no clean indication
that something is a macvlan device besides dev->rtnl_link_ops->kind
being "macvlan".

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: Is it valid to add a macvlan virtual interface to a br ..., Patrick McHardy, (Thu Dec 4, 6:01 am)