Re: [RFC PATCH 00/13] hardware time stamping + igb example implementation

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 - 9:06 am

As a general comment on the patch series I'm still a little sceptical
the time stamp offset method is a good idea. Since it tries to approximate
several unsynchronized clocks the result will always be of a little poor
quality, which will likely lead to problems sooner or later (or rather
require ugly workarounds in the user).

I think it would be better to just bite the bullet and add new fields
for this to the skbs. Hardware timestamps are useful enough to justify
this.

-Andi

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC PATCH 08/13] igb: stub support for SIOCSHWTSTAMP, Patrick Ohly, (Fri Oct 31, 5:21 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH 00/13] hardware time stamping + igb example ..., Andi Kleen, (Wed Nov 12, 9:06 am)