Per Hallsmark wrote:
quoted text
> David Miller wrote:
>> From: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
>> Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2008 13:24:17 +0100
>>
>>  
>>> Am Freitag, 7. November 2008 13:00:05 schrieb Jeff Garzik:
>>>    
>>>> Oliver Neukum wrote:
>>>>      
>>>>> Am Freitag, 7. November 2008 09:26:33 schrieb Jeff Garzik:
>>>>>        
>>>>>> I pondered taking the easy route of fixing this by surrounding the 
>>>>>> auto_pm reference with an ifdef, but it seems like usbnet could 
>>>>>> use a bit more thought -- it is questionable whether 
>>>>>> usbnet_suspend/resume should be built at all, if !CONFIG_PM, even 
>>>>>> though they are exported.
>>>>>>           
>>>>> As this is a generic problem, shouldn't we get the compiler to do
>>>>> this for us?
>>>>>         
>>>> Can you be more specific?
>>>>       
>>> As these methods are static the compiler is able to tell whether they
>>> are referenced by anything but the tables. We should be able to set
>>> an attribute in the header file that tells the compiler that these 
>>> methods
>>> won't be called and can be omitted in the build. Otherwise we have to 
>>> ifdef
>>> all those methods.
>>>     
>>
>> The problem is that the content of these functions still needs to be
>> parsed, so references to ifdef'd out structure members are still going
>> to throw errors.
>>
>> For the time being please add the necessary CONFIG_PM wrappers around
>> the suspend and resume methods, as this is what we do tree wide and
>> I don't think you want these usbnet changes blocked by some fancy
>> compiler facility that hasn't been implemented yet.
>>   
> Ok, this news I've missed. Should I regenerate the patch or is it 
> handled anyway?

regenerate, please


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html