On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:32:00AM +0100, Michael Buesch wrote:
quoted text
> On Monday 10 November 2008 23:53:43 David Miller wrote:
> > Then those architectures need to fix their implementations,
> > simply.  They aren't implementing the generic DMA interfaces
> > properly.  Other subsystems do make use of the generic DMA
> > interfaces in this way.
> > 
> > Even something as simple as checking for &pci_bus_type in the
> > dma_*() routines (like powerpc did for quite some time) is
> > enough to fix the problem.
> 
> Yeah, sure. The architectures are broken.
> But the bugreports hit _my_ code. I got pretty tired of forwarding stuff
> to the arch maintainers, so I implemented something that does work in
> every situation. The bugreports stopped immediately (Except this tiny build
> failure that does only hit under rare circumstances).
> 
> DMA is pretty much a mess, if you look at how ever arch does implement the API
> in a slightly different way.

We have tons of PCI drivers using the dma_ routines.  So please report
the broken architecture to get it fixes instead of whining.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html