Dave,
This is another collection of updates intended for 2.6.25.  There are

some ath5k cleanups, some b43 stuff, some mac80211 bits, and a few other

miscellaneous patches.
Let me know if there are problems!
Thanks!
John
---
Individual patch available here:
	http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/linville/wireless-2.6/upst...
---
The following changes since commit bae4a7effd59ef0d521de2bc97902fa0a243b544:

  David S. Miller (1):

        Merge branch 'upstream-davem' of master.kernel.org:/.../jgarzik/netdev-2.6
are available in the git repository at:
  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linville/wireless-2.6.git upstream
Bruno Randolf (6):

      ath5k: use 3 instead of 0x00000003

      ath5k: beacon interval is in TU

      ath5k: better beacon timer calculation

      ath5k: use SWBA to detect IBSS HW merges

      ath5k: configure backoff for IBSS beacon queue

      ath5k: always extend rx timestamp with tsf
Guy Cohen (1):

      mac80211: Assign correct TID for local bridged packets
Johannes Berg (1):

      mac80211: fix RCU locking in __ieee80211_rx_handle_packet
John W. Linville (2):

      ath5k: use AR5K_KEYTABLE_SIZE when initializing key table

      ath5k: reset key cache after resume
Masakazu Mokuno (1):

      WEXT: remove unused variable
Michael Buesch (4):

      b43legacy: Remove the PHY spinlock

      b43: Add more N-PHY init code

      b43: Fix firmware caching

      b43: Fix MAC control and microcode init
Ron Rindjunsky (2):

      mac80211: fixing ieee80211_bar types

      mac80211: fix rx flow sparse errors, make functions static
Stefano Brivio (1):

      rc80211-pid: fix last_sample initialization
 drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/ath5k.h         |    4 +-

 drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.c          |  240 +++++++++++++++++++----

 drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/base.h          |    3 +-

 drivers/net/wireless/ath5k/hw.c            |    6 +-

 drivers/net/wireless/b43/b43.h             |   15 +-

 drivers/net/wire...
[ message continues ]

On Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:45:21 -0500
I hope you tested this. I still haven't been able to (I received the

needed hardware yesterday), and Michael said that the patch has been

compile-tested only.
--

Ciao

Stefano

--

Larry said it worked for him.
--

John W. Linville

linville@tuxdriver.com

--

John, if we use subject lines such as:
[PATCH RFT] foobar: bizbaz
That means the patch is _not_ submitted for inclusion, yet.

The RFT means Request-For-Testing. Ususally, if I send out such

patches, they are completely untested. I usually compiletest them,

but that's it.

But in future I can also put a comment into the mailbody that

explains why to not apply it, yet.
For this particular patch, please leave it in now. I'm pretty

sure it is correct. So actual testing will be done upstream now. ;)
--

Greetings Michael.

--

Thanks, I'm well aware.
Larry said he tested it, two weeks ago.  No one contradicted it.

And time is short for new development for 2.6.25 -- but there is
Exactly.
John

--

John W. Linville

linville@tuxdriver.com

--

From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
Pulled and pushed out to net-2.6.25, thanks!

--