Hi Maks.

On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 07:18:41PM +0200, maximilian attems wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 10:12:38AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > 
> > Could you give a concrete example?
> > 
> > 	-hpa
> 
> max@dual:~/src/klibc$ touch usr/utils/mount_main.c
> max@dual:~/src/klibc$ make
>   KLIBCCC usr/utils/mount_main.o
>   KLIBCLD usr/utils/static/halt
>   LN      usr/utils/static/reboot
>   LN      usr/utils/static/poweroff
>   KLIBCLD usr/utils/shared/halt
>   LN      usr/utils/shared/reboot
>   LN      usr/utils/shared/poweroff
>   KLIBCLD usr/utils/static/chroot
>   KLIBCLD usr/utils/static/dd
>   <snipp>

I do not recall the details at the moment but I recall I had to
do this tradeoff for some reasons.
I do not say it is not fixable but when I did the static-y support
I recall I took a shortcut or two under the assumption that everything
build by klibc was anyway so simple that compiling a bit too much was no harm.

Too buried with other stuff right now.
But feel free to poke me in roughly a month and I will take a deeper look.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html