Re: drop association of connection-less socket

Previous thread: [RESEND][PATCH 4/4 Rev-3] Initialize and fill IPv6 route age by Varun Chandramohan on Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - 11:55 pm. (1 message)

Next thread: Info about updates by Sergej Stepanov on Wednesday, September 19, 2007 - 4:53 am. (1 message)
To: netdev <netdev@...>
Date: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 - 3:28 am

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The Linux man page for connect(2) currently says:

Connectionless sockets may dissolve the association by connecting to
an address with the sa_family member of sockaddr set to AF_UNSPEC.

No such wording is in the POSIX definition which only says

If address is a null address for the protocol, the socket’s peer
address shall be reset.

This is not the same but seems to be what Linux implements.

The problem is that I tried to reuse a socket which has been associated
with an IPv6 address to later connect to an IPv4 address. This is part
of the getaddrinfo implementation and an effort to make it more
efficient. strace's output looks like this:

connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET6, sin6_port=htons(0), inet_pton(AF_INET6,
"2001:11b8:1:0:207:e94f:ee7c:4b72", &sin6_addr), sin6_flowinfo=0,
sin6_scope_id=0}, 28) = -1 ENETUNREACH (Network is unreachable)

connect(3, {sa_family=AF_UNSPEC,
sa_data="\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"}, 28) = 0

connect(3, {sa_family=AF_INET, sin_port=htons(0),
sin_addr=inet_addr("192.168.1.72")}, 16) = 0

I.e., despite what the man page says, the second connect only reset the
address, as required by the POSIX spec. It did not reset the address
family of the socket.

What I ideally would like to see is what the Linux man page says. I.e.,
if the .sa_family field is AF_UNSPEC all, the address and address
family, is reset. Otherwise only the address association itself is reset.

Is this functionality which got lost over time? Or is the man page
wrong and this never was the case? Is this a worthwhile change?

- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG8M+52ijCOnn/RHQRAnTEAJ0Z/DrTkcCjpbybB5lqDad9Z0MbZwCeLZOh
u/mNfxV7uDjRsSuOj4YwuIg=
=FO70
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-

To: netdev <netdev@...>
Date: Wednesday, September 19, 2007 - 11:04 am

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I guess the request is not that useful. The family of the socket is
determined earlier so to undo this it takes more of an effort. I
managed to get by for most cases without this change so no action needed.

- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFG8TqZ2ijCOnn/RHQRAkXeAJ0RGW9zuP8xnLNVdnsHCLFR6IVJ8QCgwmBf
0ncI+FkqHE3vaYieIcHqOXo=
=UxXC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-

Previous thread: [RESEND][PATCH 4/4 Rev-3] Initialize and fill IPv6 route age by Varun Chandramohan on Tuesday, September 18, 2007 - 11:55 pm. (1 message)

Next thread: Info about updates by Sergej Stepanov on Wednesday, September 19, 2007 - 4:53 am. (1 message)