From: Holger Eitzenberger <holger@my-eitzenberger.de> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 23:05:52 +0200Your patch is incorrect and also unnecessary. Firstly, you patch compares the address _pointer_ against the minimum length. That's obviously wrong. And if you check the call sites of the protocol ->bind() methods, they all use on-stack buffer for the address object which is at least MAX_SOCK_ADDR bytes in length so that the bind methods don't have to check the size if they don't want to. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| David Miller | Re: Slow DOWN, please!!! |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO |
| Greg KH | Re: [AppArmor 39/45] AppArmor: Profile loading and manipulation, pathname matching |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Josip Rodin | bnx2_poll panicking kernel |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
