Re: Network Namespace status

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Eric W. Biederman
Date: Sunday, September 16, 2007 - 4:47 pm

David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> writes:


Sure.  Thanks.

Since the change got dropped I figured it for a rejection, and that
I would have to rework that patch.

On a similar note. It recently occurred to me that I can make creating
multiple network namespaces depend on !CONFIG_SYSFS.  Which will allow
most of the rest of the patches I am sure of to be merged now.  And
give me just a little more time to work with Tejun and finish up the
sysfs support.

Eric



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Network Namespace status, Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Sep 13, 12:12 pm)
Re: Network Namespace status, Oliver Hartkopp, (Thu Sep 13, 11:03 pm)
Re: Network Namespace status, Eric W. Biederman, (Fri Sep 14, 2:33 am)
Re: Network Namespace status, David Miller, (Sun Sep 16, 3:36 pm)
Re: Network Namespace status, Eric W. Biederman, (Sun Sep 16, 4:47 pm)