Greetings,

On 03/12/2007, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
quoted text
> On Mon, 3 Dec 2007 15:59:23 -0800
> "Shao Liu" <shaoliu@Princeton.EDU> wrote:
> > And also a question, why the samples when SACK is active are outliers?
>
> Any sample with SACK is going to mean a loss or reordering has occurred.
> So shouldn't the SACK values be useful, but RTT values from retransmits
> are not useful.

When SACK is active, the per-packet processing becomes more involved,
tracking the list of lost/SACKed packets.  This causes a CPU spike
just after a loss, which increases the RTTs, at least in my
experience.  This is a separate issue from the fact that it is hard to
get RTT measurements from lost/retransmitted packets themselves.

Cheers,
Lachlan

-- 
Lachlan Andrew  Dept of Computer Science, Caltech
1200 E California Blvd, Mail Code 256-80, Pasadena CA 91125, USA
Ph: +1 (626) 395-8820    Fax: +1 (626) 568-3603
http://netlab.caltech.edu/~lachlan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html