Lachlan Andrew wrote:
quoted text
> Thanks Stephen.
>
> A related problem (largely due to the published algorithm itself) is
> that Illinois is very aggressive when it over-estimates the maximum
> RTT.
>
> At high load (say 200Mbps and 200ms RTT), a backlog of packets builds
> up just after a loss, causing the RTT estimate to become large.  This
> makes Illinois think that *all* losses are due to corruption not
> congestion, and so only back off by 1/8 instead of 1/2.
>
> I can't think how to fix this except by better RTT estimation, or
> changes to Illinois itself.  Currently, I ignore RTT measurements when
>    sacked_out != 0    and have a heuristic "RTT aging" mechanism, but
> that's pretty ugly.
>
> Cheers,
> Lachlan
>
>   
Ageing the RTT estimates needs to be done anyway.
Maybe something can be reused from H-TCP. The two are closely related.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html