Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without socket filter | KernelTrap

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without socket filter

view
thread

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

[view in full thread]

From: David Miller <davem@...>

To: <herbert@...>

Cc: <andi@...>, <wangchen@...>, <netdev@...>

Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without socket filter

Date: Monday, November 19, 2007 - 4:26 am

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 09:09:29 +0800

quoted text> In any case, I just looked up RFC1213 and it says:
> 
>           udpInDatagrams OBJECT-TYPE
>               SYNTAX  Counter
>               ACCESS  read-only
>               STATUS  mandatory
>               DESCRIPTION
>                       "The total number of UDP datagrams delivered to
>                       UDP users."
>               ::= { udp 1 }
> 
> So I think incrementing it in recvmsg is acceptable.

Point taken, thanks for checking that.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:

[PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without sock..., Wang Chen, (Thu Nov 15, 10:46 pm)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., David Miller, (Thu Nov 15, 10:54 pm)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Wang Chen, (Thu Nov 15, 11:18 pm)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Herbert Xu, (Fri Nov 16, 12:11 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Wang Chen, (Fri Nov 16, 12:17 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Andi Kleen, (Sat Nov 17, 9:18 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., David Miller, (Sat Nov 17, 8:09 pm)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Stephen Hemminger, (Sun Nov 18, 6:14 pm)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Andi Kleen, (Sun Nov 18, 5:45 pm)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., David Miller, (Sun Nov 18, 6:40 pm)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Andi Kleen, (Mon Nov 19, 11:29 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., David Miller, (Mon Nov 19, 6:23 pm)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Bill Fink, (Tue Nov 20, 1:29 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Andi Kleen, (Tue Nov 20, 10:05 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., David Miller, (Tue Nov 20, 9:39 pm)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Wang Chen, (Thu Nov 29, 3:55 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Herbert Xu, (Thu Nov 29, 5:21 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Wang Chen, (Thu Nov 29, 6:08 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Gerrit Renker, (Thu Nov 29, 6:56 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Herbert Xu, (Thu Nov 29, 8:01 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Herbert Xu, (Thu Nov 29, 6:21 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Wang Chen, (Thu Nov 29, 6:33 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Herbert Xu, (Thu Nov 29, 6:38 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., David Miller, (Tue Nov 20, 2:15 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Wang Chen, (Tue Nov 20, 2:25 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Herbert Xu, (Tue Nov 20, 2:31 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Herbert Xu, (Mon Nov 19, 12:41 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Mon Nov 19, 7:49 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., David Miller, (Mon Nov 19, 4:32 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Wang Chen, (Sun Nov 18, 10:02 pm)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., David Miller, (Mon Nov 19, 4:30 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Herbert Xu, (Sun Nov 18, 9:09 pm)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., David Miller, (Mon Nov 19, 4:26 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., David Miller, (Fri Nov 16, 12:04 am)

Re: [PATCH 1/2] [IPV4] UDP: Always checksum even if without ..., Wang Chen, (Fri Nov 16, 12:13 am)

Navigation

Popular discussions


linux-kernel:
Artem Bityutskiy	[PATCH 12/44 take 2] [UBI] allocation unit implementation
Greg Kroah-Hartman	[PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO
Jeff Garzik	Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate()
Christoph Hellwig	pcmcia ioctl removal
git:

openbsd-misc:

linux-netdev:
Gerrit Renker	[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
David Miller	[GIT]: Networking
David Miller	Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
Jarek Poplawski	[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().

Colocation donated by:

Who's online

There are currently 1 user and 1116 guests online.

Online users

zeekec

Syndicate