Re: network interface state

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Miller
Date: Wednesday, November 14, 2007 - 5:22 pm

From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 16:12:28 -0800


Ok, I'll think about how to implement this.


Unfortunately, that won't work.  Like datagram protocols,
netlink assumes one message per sendmsg() call.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
network interface state, Ulrich Drepper, (Wed Nov 14, 1:59 pm)
Re: network interface state, David Miller, (Wed Nov 14, 4:31 pm)
Re: network interface state, Ulrich Drepper, (Wed Nov 14, 5:12 pm)
Re: network interface state, David Miller, (Wed Nov 14, 5:22 pm)
Re: network interface state, Herbert Xu, (Wed Nov 14, 7:11 pm)
Re: network interface state, David Miller, (Wed Nov 14, 8:39 pm)
Re: network interface state, jamal, (Thu Nov 15, 6:58 am)