Re: [PATCH 5/6] e1000: Secondary unicast address support

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ben Greear <greearb@...>
Cc: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@...>, <davem@...>, <jeff@...>, <netdev@...>, <jesse.brandeburg@...>
Date: Tuesday, November 13, 2007 - 8:48 pm

On Tue, 13 Nov 2007, Ben Greear wrote:

ve=20
=2E

I'm afraid mac-vlans is not a solution here. Having 2x more interfaces=20
(ex. 2000 instead of 1000) makes everything (especially routing,=20
firewalling and QoS) much more complicated. It would be nice to have=20
something like "ip addr add a.b.c.d/24 dev vlan32 hwaddress=20
aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:ff".

BTW: is it possible to stack mac-vlans ontop of .1Q vlans?

Best regards,

 =09=09=09=09Krzysztof Ol=EAdzki
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 5/6] e1000: Secondary unicast address support, David Miller, (Wed Nov 14, 12:55 am)
Re: [PATCH 5/6] e1000: Secondary unicast address support, Krzysztof Oledzki, (Tue Nov 13, 8:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH 5/6] e1000: Secondary unicast address support, Krzysztof Oledzki, (Tue Nov 13, 8:48 pm)
Re: [PATCH 5/6] e1000: Secondary unicast address support, Krzysztof Oledzki, (Tue Nov 13, 9:17 pm)