Adrian Bunk wrote:.. .. Then that person should double check their changes against the problems reported, and re-convince themselves that the breakage wasn't from those. Simple. .. Yup, but they're more specific than just that entire subsystem, and the maintainers are actively pursuing the problems. Exactly what should be happening. .. If the code I'm touching breaks, then I'll fix it ASAP, exactly what the users of that code might expect. .. It's not about blame, it's about paying attention to breakages in code that a person claims to be supporting, and then doing their best to resolve the issues. Again, if one has the time to actively write/modify code such that something breaks, then that person should also make time to fix the breakages. .. For the third time, no disagreement here. git-bsect can help in many cases, but not in all cases. And it requires a great time commitment from somebody who's system used to work and now doesn't work. The person who broke it has a fair bit of responsibility there, too. cheers - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| monstr | [PATCH 27/56] microblaze_v2: support for a.out |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | [Bug #10493] mips BCM47XX compile error |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
