Antoine Zen-Ruffinen a écrit :
quoted text
> What does it bring me to have a nanosecond precision if it is not
> related to the actual arrival of frame time ? As it seem I can feel
> skb->tstamp with whatever I want, I always become something else using
> ioctl(). (I'm using kernel 2.6.23).
>
> 2007/11/12, Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>:
>   
>> On Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:42:34 +0100
>> "Antoine Zen-Ruffinen" <antoine.zen@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> I'm writing a network analyzer software using Linux and I need a VERY
>>> precise frame time stamping. Therefor I am planing to add my own time
>>> stamping algorithm on a modified network driver. For test purpose I
>>> did so :
>>>
>>>       skb->tstamp.tv64 = 0x00010002;
>>>       netif_rx(skb);
>>>
>>> On the user side, I ask for the timestamp that way :
>>>
>>>       ...
>>>       sock = socket(AF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, type);
>>>       ...
>>>       //bind this socket with the interface using my modified driver.
>>>       ...
>>>       recvByteCount = recv(sock, buffer, 1514, 0);
>>>       ioctl(sock, SIOCGSTAMP, &timeStamp);
>>>
>>> I was surprised to see that the var timeStamp was still holding a
>>> count of second since  year 1970.
>>>       
But then, maybe your problem comes from your code : timeStamp should be 
declared as "struct timeval" of course, to get both tv_sec and tv_usec.

struct timeval tv;
ioctl(sock, SIOCSTAMP, &tv);
printf("packet arrived at %ld.%06ld\n", (long)tv.tv_sec, (long)tv.tv_usec);


If you *want* nanosecond resolution instead of microsecond, use :

struct timespec ts;
ioctl(sock, SIOCSTAMPNS, &ts);
printf("packet arrived at %ld.%09ld\n", (long)ts.tv_sec, (long)ts.tv_nsec);




-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html