Re: [patch 1/1][NETNS][IPV6] protect addrconf from loopback registration

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Denis V. Lunev
Date: Monday, November 12, 2007 - 2:00 pm

> Let me try to clarify:

this should not be a problem :). IPv6 exiting code could remove in_dev6
at the protocol layer. In this case the notifier will be noop. This
approach is completely equivalent to the unloading of IPv6 module with
persistent loopback.

The registration is still the problem. May be we need to separate
registration from initialization and perform it after protocol layer for
all loopback devices? I'd like this right now, but this is tight change...

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [patch 1/1][NETNS][IPV6] protect addrconf from loopbac ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Mon Nov 12, 9:40 am)
Re: [patch 1/1][NETNS][IPV6] protect addrconf from loopbac ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Mon Nov 12, 9:51 am)
Re: [patch 1/1][NETNS][IPV6] protect addrconf from loopbac ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Mon Nov 12, 9:59 am)
Re: [patch 1/1][NETNS][IPV6] protect addrconf from loopbac ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Mon Nov 12, 12:50 pm)
Re: [patch 1/1][NETNS][IPV6] protect addrconf from loopbac ..., Denis V. Lunev, (Mon Nov 12, 2:00 pm)
Re: [patch 1/1][NETNS][IPV6] protect addrconf from loopbac ..., YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / , (Mon Nov 12, 6:52 pm)
Re: [patch 1/1][NETNS][IPV6] protect addrconf from loopbac ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Tue Nov 13, 5:59 am)
Re: [patch 1/1][NETNS][IPV6] protect addrconf from loopbac ..., Eric W. Biederman, (Tue Nov 13, 6:11 am)