Re: af_packet.c flush_dcache_page

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <kaber@...>
Cc: <netdev@...>
Date: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 - 6:57 pm

From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:08:02 +0100


Thanks for bringing up this topic.

Instead of answering your questions, I'm going to show you
how to avoid having to do any of this cache flushing crap :-)

You can avoid having to flush anything as long as the virtual
addresses on the kernel side are modulo SHMLBA the virtual addresses
on the userland side.

We have some (decidedly awkward) mechanisms to try and achieve
this in the kernel, but they are cumbersome and not air tight.

Instead, I would recommend simply that you access the ring
buffer directly in userspace.  This avoids all of the cache
aliasing issues.

Yes, this means you have to do the ring buffer accesses in
the context of the user, but it simplifies so much that I think
it'd be worth it.

Another option is to use the "copy_to_user_page()" and
"copy_from_user_page()" interfaces which will do all of
the necessary cache flushing for you.

Actually it might be nice to convert AF_PACKET's mmap() code
over to using those things.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
af_packet.c flush_dcache_page, Patrick McHardy, (Wed Oct 31, 10:08 am)
Re: af_packet.c flush_dcache_page, David Miller, (Wed Oct 31, 6:57 pm)
Re: af_packet.c flush_dcache_page, Patrick McHardy, (Thu Nov 1, 12:10 pm)
Re: af_packet.c flush_dcache_page, Evgeniy Polyakov, (Thu Nov 1, 12:27 pm)