Eric W. Biederman a écrit :
quoted text
> Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> writes:
> 
> 
>> Definitly wanted here. Thank you.
>> One more refcounting on each socket creation/deletion was expensive.
> 
> Really?  Have you actually measured that?  If the overhead is
> measurable and expensive we may want to look at per cpu counters or
> something like that.  So far I don't have any numbers that say any
> of the network namespace work inherently has any overhead.

It seems that on some old opterons (two 246 for example),
"if (atomic_dec_and_test(&net->count))" is rather expensive yes :(

I am not sure per cpu counters help : I tried this and got no speedup. (This 
was on net_device refcnt at that time)

(on this machines, the access through fs/gs selector seems expensive too)

Maybe a lazy mode could be done, ie only do a atomic_dec(), as done in dev_put() ?

Also, "count" sits in a cache line that contains mostly read and shared 
fields, you might want to put it in a separate cache line in SMP, to avoid 
cache line ping-pongs.


quoted text
> 
>> Maybe we can add a macro to get nd_net from a "struct net_device"
>> so that every instance of
>>
>> if (dev->nd_net != &init_net)
>>     goto drop;
>>
>> can also be optimized away if !CONFIG_NET_NS
> 
> Well that extra check should be removed once we finish converting
> those code paths.  So I'm not too worried.

OK. Since the conditional test can be predicted by cpu, it certainly doesnt 
matter.

quoted text
> 
> If this becomes a big issue I can dig up my old code that
> replaced struct net * with a net_t typedef and used functions
> for all of the comparisons and allowed everything to be compiled
> away.



quoted text
> 
> Trouble was it was sufficiently different that it was just enough
> different that people could not immediately understand the code.
> 


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html