Re: [PATCH] net: docbook fixes for netif_ functions

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@...>, <netdev@...>
Date: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 - 6:36 pm

On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:08:48 -0700 Stephen Hemminger wrote:




For the 3 lines above, how about:

 *	Return values (usually ignored):
 *	NET_RX_SUCCESS: no congestion
 *	NET_RX_DROP: packet was dropped


only because they come out of kernel-doc badly, munged together like so:

       return  values  (usually  ignored).    NET_RX_SUCCESS (no   congestion)
       NET_RX_DROP     (packet was dropped)



Thanks for doing this patch.
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] net: docbook fixes for netif_ functions, Stephen Hemminger, (Wed Oct 31, 5:08 pm)
Re: [PATCH] net: docbook fixes for netif_ functions, Randy Dunlap, (Wed Oct 31, 6:36 pm)
Re: [PATCH] net: docbook fixes for netif_ functions, David Miller, (Thu Nov 1, 5:22 am)