Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make nicer CONFIG_NET_NS=n case code

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...>, Linux Netdev List <netdev@...>, <devel@...>
Date: Wednesday, October 31, 2007 - 6:05 pm

Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com> writes:



Really?  Have you actually measured that?  If the overhead is
measurable and expensive we may want to look at per cpu counters or
something like that.  So far I don't have any numbers that say any
of the network namespace work inherently has any overhead.


Well that extra check should be removed once we finish converting
those code paths.  So I'm not too worried.

If this becomes a big issue I can dig up my old code that
replaced struct net * with a net_t typedef and used functions
for all of the comparisons and allowed everything to be compiled
away.

Trouble was it was sufficiently different that it was just enough
different that people could not immediately understand the code.

Eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 0/5] Make nicer CONFIG_NET_NS=n case code, Pavel Emelyanov, (Wed Oct 31, 3:19 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make nicer CONFIG_NET_NS=n case code, Daniel Lezcano, (Wed Oct 31, 5:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make nicer CONFIG_NET_NS=n case code, Eric Dumazet, (Wed Oct 31, 2:49 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make nicer CONFIG_NET_NS=n case code, Eric W. Biederman, (Wed Oct 31, 6:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make nicer CONFIG_NET_NS=n case code, Eric Dumazet, (Wed Oct 31, 6:40 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make nicer CONFIG_NET_NS=n case code, Eric W. Biederman, (Wed Oct 31, 8:51 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make nicer CONFIG_NET_NS=n case code, Eric Dumazet, (Thu Nov 1, 2:58 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make nicer CONFIG_NET_NS=n case code, David Miller, (Thu Nov 1, 3:02 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make nicer CONFIG_NET_NS=n case code, David Miller, (Wed Oct 31, 7:31 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make nicer CONFIG_NET_NS=n case code, Eric W. Biederman, (Wed Oct 31, 8:58 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/5] Make nicer CONFIG_NET_NS=n case code, Daniel Lezcano, (Wed Oct 31, 5:35 pm)
[PATCH 5/5] Hide the net_ns kmem cache, Pavel Emelyanov, (Wed Oct 31, 3:32 pm)
Re: [PATCH 5/5] Hide the net_ns kmem cache, David Miller, (Thu Nov 1, 3:47 am)
[PATCH 4/5] Mark the setup_net as __net_init, Pavel Emelyanov, (Wed Oct 31, 3:31 pm)
Re: [PATCH 4/5] Mark the setup_net as __net_init, David Miller, (Thu Nov 1, 3:46 am)
[PATCH 3/5] Hide the dead code in the net_namespace.c, Pavel Emelyanov, (Wed Oct 31, 3:28 pm)
[PATCH 2/5] Relax the reference counting of init_net_ns, Pavel Emelyanov, (Wed Oct 31, 3:25 pm)