> A few notes to the discussion. I've seen one e1000 "bug" that ended up beingThat could well be my problem, this is a dual processor (not core) athlon (not opteron) tyan motherboard if I recall correctly. The acks (because I'm sending) are about 1.5 packets/interrupt. When this box is receiving it's moving about 3x ass much data and has a _lower_ (absolute, not per packet) interrupt load. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitkeeper.com - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| James Bottomley | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Stephen Rothwell | Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Patrick McHardy | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
