Wednesday 24 October 2007 21:18, jamal wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, 2007-24-10 at 12:30 +0900, Masahide NAKAMURA wrote:
> 
> > At IPsec point of view, actually "SPI mismatch" caused by user configuration
> > cannot be identified easily since identify of SAD is consist of SPI, address and
> > protocol(ESP/AH...) and linux SAD uses hash database. It is database identify
> > mismatch. Then, SPI mismatch goes "NoStates" at my patch.
> > OTOH Key mismatch goes "ProtoError" since esp[46]_input returns error.
> 
> Would be useful to just document what you said above so that user doesnt
> have to intepret it.

OK, I write it to commit-log then. If anybody have another place
where such information should be written, tell me.

[snip]
quoted text
> > > In any case, it seems to me to be more accurate to not call them MIB
> > > stats if they are not. This doesnt qualify using the macros, utilities
> > > etc used for MIBs.
> > 
> 
> BTW, I meant "doesnt disqualify them" above;-> 

OK ;-)

Jamal, thanks for many comments.

-- 
Masahide NAKAMURA
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html