Then I got very, very lucky, since I have successfully rebooted
2.6.23.1-23.fc8 four times (zero panics) and this is the first time a
2.6.23 kernel has not panicked on me in months.

This does not fill me with confidence in the theory that the panics I've
been seeing are due to a race condition.

Dave

quoted text
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Jones [mailto:davej@redhat.com] 
> Sent: Sunday, October 21, 2007 6:05 PM
> To: Kok, Auke
> Cc: David Mack; Herbert Xu; netdev@vger.kernel.org; 
> esandeen@redhat.com
> Subject: Re: e100 problems in .23rc8 ?
> 
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 10:59:59AM -0700, Kok, Auke wrote:
>  > David Mack wrote:
>  > > It appears that the needed e100 fix made it into the Fedora
>  > > 2.6.23.1-23.fc8 kernel. Boots reliably now.
>  > > 
>  > > Huge thanks and great work, guys.
>  > 
>  > DaveJ, I didn't push anything upstream. Can you verify 
> this now works?
> 
> There was no e100 changes in the kernel above, so David just
> got lucky. (The race doesn't always occur, so it sometimes appears
> something got fixed.).
> 
> I included the patch below in the latest build, but I've not had
> chance to try it on an e100 box yet..
> 
> 	Dave
> 
> --- linux-2.6.23.noarch/drivers/net/e100.c~	2007-10-18 
> 16:10:40.000000000 -0400
> +++ linux-2.6.23.noarch/drivers/net/e100.c	2007-10-18 
> 16:16:02.000000000 -0400
> @@ -2682,6 +2682,8 @@ static int __devinit e100_probe(struct p
>  	if (err)
>  		DPRINTK(PROBE, ERR, "Error clearing wake event\n");
>  
> +	netif_poll_disable(netdev);
> +
>  	strcpy(netdev->name, "eth%d");
>  	if((err = register_netdev(netdev))) {
>  		DPRINTK(PROBE, ERR, "Cannot register net 
> device, aborting.\n");
> 
> -- 
> http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
> 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html