Re: [PATCH 1/1][TCP]: break missing at end of switch statement

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki
Date: Monday, October 1, 2007 - 6:20 am

In article <200710011332.43657@strip-the-willow> (at Mon, 1 Oct 2007 13:32:43 +0100), Gerrit Renker <gerrit@erg.abdn.ac.uk> says:


NAK; it is not required at all.

--yoshfuji
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 1/1][TCP]: break missing at end of switch statement, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki, (Mon Oct 1, 6:20 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/1][TCP]: break missing at end of switch statement, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, (Mon Oct 1, 7:31 am)