Brian Jackson wrote:>> ... Ok, I see your point. I simply used -cpu because of technical reasons (the core topology is reflected in CPUID, which -cpu cares about). But you are right, it does not belong here, -smp looks like a good candidate (IMO better than -numa). Or we use an abstract "-topology" for this, but this seems like overkill. So what about: "-smp 4,cores=2,threads=2[,sockets=1]" to inject 4 vCPUs in one package (automatically determined if omitted) with two cores and two threads/core? All parameters except the number of vCPUs would be optional, which would make this new format backwards compatible. Only we have to agree on the default topology: multi-socket like the current implementation or multi-core, which would mimic the most common SMP architecture today. It seems that the latter one causes less problems for guests. Regards, Andre. -- Andre Przywara AMD-Operating System Research Center (OSRC), Dresden, Germany Tel: +49 351 488-3567-12 ----to satisfy European Law for business letters: Advanced Micro Devices GmbH Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. Muenchen Geschaeftsfuehrer: Jochen Polster; Thomas M. McCoy; Giuliano Meroni Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Amit K. Arora | [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Chuck Ebbert | Why do so many machines need "noapic"? |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
