Re: [DRBD-user] kvm, drbd, elevator, rotational - quite an interesting co-operation

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Lars Ellenberg <lars.ellenberg@...>
Cc: Michael Tokarev <mjt@...>, KVM list <kvm@...>, <drbd-user@...>
Date: Friday, July 3, 2009 - 9:06 am

Lars Ellenberg wrote:

just like with KVM itself, using several worker threads against a single IO device makes performance heavily dependent on a sensible elevator algorithm.  ideally, there should be only one worker thread for each thread/process originating the initial write.  unfortunately DRBD, being a block/level protocol, might have a hard time unraveling which writes belong to which process.  maybe just merging adjacent (in block address space, not in time) write operations would keep most of the relationships.

-- 
Javier
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [DRBD-user] kvm, drbd, elevator, rotational - quite an i..., Javier Guerra, (Fri Jul 3, 9:06 am)