On 07/03/2009 08:23 AM, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, 2009-07-02 at 13:10 +0800, Yolkfull Chow wrote:
>    
>> Signed-off-by: Yolkfull Chow<yzhou@redhat.com>
>> ---
>>    client/tests/qemu_iotests/control         |   31 ++++++++++++++
>>    client/tests/qemu_iotests/qemu_iotests.py |   63
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>    2 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>    create mode 100644 client/tests/qemu_iotests/control
>>    create mode 100755 client/tests/qemu_iotests/qemu_iotests.py
>>      
> Ok, I've been trough the test and took a look at the testsuite itself.
> Both look good. The testsuite requires a very current qemu-img package,
> due to the use of qemu-io (F11 for instance doesn't ship it). So if you
> want to try this make sure you use a current version of the kvm
> utilities.
>    
I had compiled upstream qemu codes and run this test based on it, worked 
fine though two cases failed for some reason.
quoted text
> +1
>
> Lucas
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>    


-- 
Yolkfull
Regards,

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html