Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] ATS capability support for Intel IOMMU

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Zhao, Yu
Date: Thursday, March 19, 2009 - 7:47 pm

Jesse Barnes wrote:

If it's possible, I'd like it go through the PCI tree because the ATS 
depends on the SR-IOV. This dependency is not reflected in this v3 
series since the SR-IOV is not in-tree and I don't want to break the 
build after people apply the ATS on their tree.

So Dave, can I get an ack from you and let Jesse pull the IOMMU change 
to his tree? Or let this ATS go to 2.6.31?

Thanks,
Yu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH v3 1/6] PCI: support the ATS capability, Yu Zhao, (Thu Feb 12, 5:50 am)
[PATCH v3 6/6] VT-d: support the device IOTLB, Yu Zhao, (Thu Feb 12, 5:50 am)
Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] ATS capability support for Intel IOMMU, Matthew Wilcox, (Thu Feb 12, 8:44 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] ATS capability support for Intel IOMMU, Grant Grundler, (Sat Feb 14, 3:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] VT-d: support the device IOTLB, Grant Grundler, (Sat Feb 14, 4:20 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] ATS capability support for Intel IOMMU, Grant Grundler, (Fri Feb 27, 12:19 am)
Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] ATS capability support for Intel IOMMU, Zhao, Yu, (Thu Mar 19, 7:47 pm)
Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] ATS capability support for Intel IOMMU, David Woodhouse, (Fri Mar 20, 4:15 am)