A couple questions.

On Mon, 2011-01-03 at 16:26 -0500, Rik van Riel wrote:
quoted text
> When running SMP virtual machines, it is possible for one VCPU to be
> spinning on a spinlock, while the VCPU that holds the spinlock is not
> currently running, because the host scheduler preempted it to run
> something else.

Do you have any numbers?

If I were to, say, run a 256 CPU VM on my quad, would this help me get
more hackbench or whatever oomph from my (256X80386/20:) box?

quoted text
> Both Intel and AMD CPUs have a feature that detects when a virtual
> CPU is spinning on a lock and will trap to the host.

Does an Intel Q6600 have this trap gizmo (iow will this do anything at
all for my little box if I were to try it out).

	-Mike

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/